Technical Report 4: WISC-V Special Group Study: Children with Hearing Differences Who Utilize Spoken Language and Have Assistive TechnologyĪ CHC chart for recording Wechsler V subtest scores and table of Gf-Gc Classification and WISC-V SubtestsĬritical values for significant differences between the Verbal Comprehension and Nonverbal Indexes including an example for using itĪpp. Technical Report 3: Using the WASI-II with the WISC-V Testing Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing (Tech Report # 2) Technical Report 2: This document from Pearson is intended to shed light on the complexities of testing deaf and hard of hearing children by people who have had sufficient training in and knowledge of language and cultural issues for this population. Technical Report 1: This report talks about the derivation and use of two expanded scores, the Verbal VECI score, and the Expanded Fluid Index (EFI). There are still the issues of changes in content of the same subtest on the two scales and, of course, the Flynn Effect. I use ☒ scaled score points as an approximation for a 95% confidence interval. WISC-V scores If we re-test (or re-re-re-test) with the WISC-V a student who previously took the WISC-IV, I think it is prudent to administer Comprehension, Symbol Search, Information (if the student took it on the WISC-IV), Picture Concepts, Arithmetic (if the student took it on the WISC-IV), and especially Letter-Number Sequencing (so we can compare the WISC-IV WMI with the WISC-V AWMI (or, as Laurie Farr Hanks noticed that it is written in one place on the Record Form, AMWI). Scaled Score is Compared to the Mean Subtest Scaled Score by John Willis and Ron DumontĪ one page comparison of WISC IV and WISC V scores with the following introduction: Differences Required for Significance When Each WISC-V Subtest.Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement.

Wasi ii scoring manual